Review

Supporting Perinatal Health in Individuals with Obesity: Integrative and Naturopathic Perspectives

Alexsia Priolo,1 ND, Carly King,2 ND, Meghan McNaughton,3 ND, and Kelsey Hroch,4 ND


ABSTRACT

Obesity in the perinatal period represents a growing public health concern with significant implications for short- and long-term maternal and fetal outcomes. This review summarizes the current recommendations related to perinatal obesity, exploring evidence-informed strategies for prevention and management from the preconception to the postpartum period.

In the preconception period, this review addresses weight management, lifestyle counselling, targeted supplementation, and behaviour strategies through motivational interviewing. During pregnancy, strategies to support optimal gestational weight gain, evidence-based supplementation to mitigate risks of complications such as preeclampsia and gestational diabetes, and lifestyle interventions aimed at reducing obesity-related pregnancy risks are reviewed. Lastly, in the postpartum period, this review examines the impact of maternal obesity on early recovery, breastfeeding initiation, and mental health, as well as the long-term risks of postpartum weight retention and strategies to support sustainable, values-aligned lifestyle changes.

Future directions should prioritize interdisciplinary collaboration, including obstetrics, primary care, nutrition, behavioural health, and community-based support systems. Research is also needed to refine diagnostic criteria, evaluate the long-term effects of prenatal interventions, and ensure equitable care for populations disproportionately affected by obesity and its sequelae.

Key Words Perinatal health, obesity, naturopathic medicine, preconception, pregnancy, postpartum, gestational diabetes, preeclampsia


INTRODUCTION

Obesity in the perinatal period represents a growing public health concern with significant implications for maternal and fetal outcomes. The rising prevalence of obesity among individuals of reproductive age has paralleled increases in pregnancy-related complications, including gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), hypertensive disorders, Caesarean delivery, and postpartum weight retention.1 Infants born to individuals with obesity are also at elevated risk for macrosomia, preterm birth, and long-term metabolic dysregulation.2

Despite the well-established risks, clinical management of obesity during pregnancy and the postpartum period remains challenging. Current guidelines emphasize early risk stratification, individualized nutrition and lifestyle counselling, and close metabolic monitoring, but implementation is often inconsistent. There is also a need for clearer consensus on effective dietary interventions, safe supplementation, and postpartum weight management strategies that support maternal health.

This review aims to synthesize current evidence on the multifaceted risks associated with perinatal obesity and to explore practical, evidence-informed strategies for prevention and management. It addresses preconception and prenatal considerations, including optimal weight gain targets and the role of micronutrient supplementation. Additionally, postpartum strategies for reducing long-term metabolic risk and promoting sustainable weight loss in individuals with obesity are discussed. Emphasis is placed on individualized, non-stigmatizing care that integrates nutrition, physical activity, and behavioural health.

By reviewing the current literature and identifying gaps in care, this paper seeks to support a more integrative, prevention-oriented approach to perinatal care for individuals with obesity—one that promotes lifelong cardiometabolic health for both parent and child.

PRECONCEPTION GUIDANCE

Obesity among reproductive-aged women is a pressing issue for health systems in Canada and the United States. Nearly 40% of women enter pregnancy with overweight or obesity, conditions linked with increased risks of infertility, GDM, hypertensive disorders, preterm birth, and stillbirth.3 The metabolic dysfunction associated with obesity can also lead to changes in placental function and vascular formation in the fetus.4 A study reviewing preconception health knowledge among women planning a pregnancy found that 51% had poor knowledge of the risks associated with obesity in pregnancy, and that 31% misperceived their own body weight, which was more likely among overweight women (71%) than those with obesity (10%).5

Preconception care offers a unique window to reduce these risks and improve pregnancy outcomes through comprehensive, individualized interventions. Canadian and American guidelines, particularly from the Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada (SOGC) and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG), endorse integrated strategies that include weight optimization, lifestyle counselling, nutritional supplementation, and behavioural support.

Risk Assessment: BMI Classification and Limitations

Body mass index (BMI) remains the standard tool for obesity classification. According to the World Health Organization (WHO) and adopted by both SOGC and ACOG:

While BMI is practical for population-level risk stratification, it does not distinguish between fat and lean body mass or account for weight distribution. Waist circumference may offer additional insight into metabolic risk, particularly central adiposity, which is strongly associated with insulin resistance and cardiovascular disease. Clinical assessment may integrate both BMI and waist circumference to monitor patient progress and track change over time (Table 1).

TABLE 1 Waist circumference values by BMI for Caucasian women and high-risk waist circumference range (80–95 cm), depending on ethnicity, above which individuals face increased cardiometabolic risk.

Weight Management and Risk Reduction

Weight loss before conception has notable benefits for women with obesity. A 5% to 10% reduction in pre-pregnancy weight improves insulin sensitivity, restores ovulation, enhances fertility, and significantly lowers the risks of pregnancy complications, such as preeclampsia and Caesarean delivery.3 Weight management approaches should include dietary modification, increased physical activity, and behaviour change strategies. According to SOGC guidelines, even small weight reductions prior to pregnancy can improve perinatal outcomes and reduce the incidence of large-for-gestational-age (LGA) infants.7

Diet and Physical Activity Counselling

Evidence-supported nutrition interventions, such as the Mediterranean or DASH diets, offer substantial benefits in the preconception phase. These diets emphasize high intake of fruits, vegetables, whole grains, legumes, and healthy fats, while reducing red meat and refined sugars. They also emphasize a reduction in packaged and processed foods, which are often high in sugar or sodium, and can lead to overconsumption or take the place of more nutritional options. A low-glycemic index dietary pattern has also been linked with improved glucose control and ovulatory function.8

Physical activity is equally critical. ACOG and SOGC recommend at least 150 minutes per week of moderate-intensity aerobic exercise. These include brisk walking, swimming, or cycling. Regular physical activity reduces GDM risk, enhances insulin sensitivity, and improves cardiovascular function. Combining dietary and exercise interventions can reduce gestational weight gain and improve the likelihood of live birth in women with prior infertility.3

Evidence-Based Supplementation

Both ACOG and Health Canada recommend targeted supplementation for women with obesity planning pregnancy. Key nutrients include:

Screening and Laboratory Testing

Routine preconception screening should include complete blood count (CBC), ferritin, thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH), HbA1c, fasting glucose or insulin, 25(OH)D levels, lipid profile, renal function (including proteinuria and serum creatinine), liver function tests, sexually transmitted infection (STI) screening, and assessment of rubella and varicella immunity.7 Additional screening may include polysomnography to assess for obstructive sleep apnea, which has been associated with increased risk of preeclampsia (odds ratio [OR] 2.5), eclampsia (OR 5.4), cardiomyopathy (OR 9.0), and gestational diabetes (OR 1.9).12 This enables early identification and treatment of subclinical deficiencies and chronic disease, which can influence conception and pregnancy outcomes.

Motivational Interviewing and Behavioural Change

Emerging research supports the use of motivational interviewing (MI) as an effective strategy in facilitating preconception behaviour change. In a 2024 randomized controlled trial, women receiving up to 10 MI-based health coaching sessions reported high satisfaction, improved confidence, and significant lifestyle improvements.13 The collaborative, non-judgmental approach of MI aligns well with preconception counselling, helping patients identify goals, build self-efficacy, and overcome barriers. One retrospective study looked at MI as a weight loss tool prior to fertility treatment, noting a statistical difference for the MI group compared with controls (9.3 kg loss vs 7.3 kg, p = 0.01).14 Other studies have shown that pairing evidence-based weight management strategies with MI can lead to meaningful reductions in gestational weight gain and promote long-term health behaviour maintenance.8 Motivational interviewing further enhances patient engagement, offering a sustainable model for behaviour change in this high-risk population.

Effective preconception care for women with obesity requires a holistic, evidence-informed approach that incorporates Canadian and American clinical guidelines. By combining individualized weight loss plans, dietary and physical activity guidance, targeted supplementation, and behavioural support, clinicians can significantly reduce the risk of adverse maternal and fetal outcomes.

PREGNANCY GUIDANCE

A pregnant person’s BMI can affect their experience with perinatal care. Although many individuals with obesity seek guidance on nutrition and weight gain during pregnancy, they are often met with judgment and biased treatment based on their weight.15

A 2024 study demonstrated that pregnant people with a BMI over 30 encountered increased weight stigma, mistreatment, and disrespect by obstetric care providers.15 Care providers can provide compassionate care by understanding that a person’s ability, opportunity, and motivation to engage in healthy behaviours is impacted by social determinants of health. These include education, employment, early childhood development, food insecurity, housing, income, and stress.16 While many pregnancies affected by obesity can have successful outcomes, maternal weight in pregnancy does carry a risk for both adverse pregnancy and adverse fetal outcomes (Table 2).17

TABLE 2 Adverse outcomes associated with obese pregnant women

In 2009, the Institute of Medicine (IOM) outlined the recommended gestational weight gain in a singleton pregnancy, based on a person’s pre-pregnancy BMI (Table 3).18,19 Gestational weight gain is defined as the amount of weight gained during pregnancy and is calculated between the weight reported at the first prenatal visit and the last visit before birth.19 It is important to note that weight gain during pregnancy is responsible for a number of factors: fat stores, increased blood volume, increased extravascular fluid volume, uterine enlargement, breast enlargement, amniotic fluid, placenta, and fetus.19

TABLE 3 IOM gestational weight gain recommendations

Research indicates a high prevalence of gestational weight gain exceeding IOM recommendations, potentially due to factors such as reduced physical activity and suboptimal dietary intake.20 The SOGC suggests that many women with obesity are unaware of the risks associated with excessive gestational weight gain due to insufficient counselling from healthcare providers.21

The IOM guidelines have been subject to ongoing debate, with some experts arguing that the recommended gestational weight gain for individuals with overweight and obesity is too high. Additionally, the guidelines do not differentiate weight gain targets among obesity classes.9 Furthermore, due to variations in body composition across racial groups, the World Health Organization has considered using alternative obesity classification criteria for Asian women.22

REDUCING THE RISK OF NOTABLE ADVERSE PREGNANCY OUTCOMES ASSOCIATED WITH OBESITY

Obesity is a known risk factor for common adverse pregnancy outcomes outlined in Table 2, such as preeclampsia and gestational diabetes. Naturopathic doctors are well positioned to provide early education on these conditions and counsel on preventive strategies, particularly given that many pregnant individuals do not engage with a primary obstetric care provider until the second trimester.

Preeclampsia

Preeclampsia, affecting approximately 1.6% to 2.6% of pregnancies in Canada,23 is a hypertensive disorder of pregnancy that most often arises in healthy, nulliparous women with no obvious risk factors.24 However, the risk of preeclampsia is nearly threefold higher among individuals with obesity.17

Common strategies to reduce preeclampsia risk include:

TABLE 4 Guidance of aspirin prophylaxis to reduce preeclampsia risk

Gestational Diabetes

Gestational diabetes is one of the most common pregnancy complications, affecting about 10% of pregnancies in Canada.30 Obesity is considered a strong predictor in the development of gestational diabetes.31

According to SOGC guidelines, individuals with obesity and additional risk factors, such as maternal age over 35, a family history of diabetes, previous gestational diabetes, or a history of delivering a macrosomic infant, may be offered either the 1-hour 50-g oral glucose challenge test or the diagnostic 75-g oral glucose tolerance test during the first half of pregnancy. If initial screening is negative, repeat testing is recommended between 24 and 28 weeks of gestation.32

Common strategies to reduce the risk of GDM include:

MANAGEMENT OF OBESITY IN PREGNANCY

Achieving an optimal weight prior to conception is ideal.36 Nevertheless, primary weight management strategies during pregnancy focus on dietary modification, physical activity, and behavioural interventions.9 Given that nearly 60% of pregnancies are planned, there is a significant opportunity to implement lifestyle changes, particularly in diet and exercise, to support maternal health and reduce the risk of adverse maternal and fetal outcomes.1

Minimizing Weight Gain

SOGC guidelines recommend calculating BMI at the initial prenatal visit and limiting gestational weight gain to 5–9 kg in individuals with obesity.21 In addition, ACOG advises using BMI to guide individualized dietary and physical activity recommendations during pregnancy.9

Discussion of weight and gestational weight gain should begin at the first prenatal visit. Motivational interviewing techniques are recommended, including obtaining permission to discuss sensitive topics (e.g., weight gain), screening for a history of eating disorders, and asking open-ended questions when appropriate. Examples include: “What are your thoughts about weight gain during pregnancy?” or, in subsequent pregnancies, “Can you describe what weight gain was like in your last pregnancy?”8 Responses can inform a supportive and collaborative approach to optimizing gestational weight gain.

Weight loss during pregnancy is not recommended, as inadequate gestational weight gain may increase the risk of fetal growth restriction.20 A 2015 systematic review found that individuals with obesity who lost weight during pregnancy were more likely to deliver infants who were SGA.37

Diet

During pregnancy, most individuals fall short on recommended intakes of vegetables, fruits, whole grains, dairy, and seafood, while exceeding limits for sodium, saturated fat, and added sugars.38 The International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) Nutrition Checklist (Table 5) can help naturopathic doctors assess and guide dietary intake.38 Notably, adherence to a Mediterranean-style diet during pregnancy is linked to a 22% lower risk of preeclampsia (OR 0.78), especially among Black women, and a 36% reduced risk of gestational diabetes.39,40

TABLE 5 Sample of FIGO’s nutrition checklist for pre-pregnant/early pregnant women

Exercise

Exercise is recommended for all pregnant women, as there are improved outcomes and healthier gestational weight gain in those who engage in regular physical activity.20 Despite the benefits, obese women cite lack of knowledge about appropriate exercise, conflicting advice, lack of access to correct information, support, and advice on exercise during pregnancy from their obstetrical care providers as barriers to exercise.39 This is a critical opportunity for naturopathic doctors to provide guidance and lower these barriers.

Exercise recommendations for women in pregnancy are:

  1. All women without a contraindication (see Table 6) should be physically active throughout pregnancy. Pregnant people with absolute contraindications are limited to their regular activities of daily living and nothing more strenuous. Those with relative contraindications, however, are encouraged to discuss the advantages and disadvantages of moderate-intensity physical activity with their care provider.42
  2. At least 150 minutes of moderate-intensity physical activity should be accumulated each week, over a minimum of 3 days.
  3. A variety of aerobic and resistance training should be incorporated to achieve greater benefits.42

TABLE 6 Absolute and relative contraindications to exercise in pregnancy

Suitable exercises for people with obesity include brisk walking, stationary cycling, swimming, and aqua aerobics, as they may provide less strain on muscle and ligaments. In addition, regular monitoring of exercise is encouraged, as well as using heart rate monitoring to ensure that the appropriate intensity is achieved.

Although the SOGC guidelines for obesity in pregnancy recommend that previously sedentary pregnant people should begin exercise early in the second trimester, research demonstrates that to reduce the risk of developing gestational hypertensive disorders, such as preeclampsia, physical activity should begin in the first trimester of pregnancy.43 In addition, the risk of developing gestational diabetes is reduced by 13% when 150 minutes of physical activity during the week are achieved in the first trimester.44

POSTPARTUM GUIDANCE

The postpartum period represents an underemphasized phase in the continuum of perinatal care, particularly for individuals affected by overweight or obesity. While prenatal care receives concentrated attention, support tends to diminish after delivery, despite evidence that the postpartum window is essential for shaping long-term maternal health outcomes. Obesity compounds the challenges of recovery, increasing the risk of surgical complications, delayed wound healing, cardiometabolic conditions, and mental health disorders.4850 Many individuals retain excess weight after childbirth, and this persistent weight retention is a known risk factor for developing type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease later in life.4851 Yet most postpartum care models remain generalized and reactive, rather than responsive to the specific needs of this high-risk population. Reframing the postpartum period as a strategic opportunity for prevention, recovery, and health optimization, rather than focusing narrowly on weight loss, may offer a more impactful approach to maternal care.

The Unseen Burden: How Obesity Affects Postpartum Recovery

Postpartum recovery varies significantly between individuals, but those with obesity often face additional complexities within standard care models. A higher BMI is associated not only with an increased risk of pregnancy-related complications but also with delayed healing and a more complex postpartum recovery.52 Obesity is an independent risk factor for both elective and emergency Caesarean delivery and is linked to prolonged labour, anesthesia-related complications, extended hospitalization, and higher rates of postpartum hemorrhage and infection.21,52

Beyond wound healing, individuals with a higher BMI are more likely to report persistent low back and pelvic pain, fatigue, and reduced mobility, which can impact infant bonding, breastfeeding, and maternal mental health.50 Establishing breastfeeding can also be more difficult, especially in cases involving early maternal-infant separation, such as Caesarean delivery.55 These individuals are less likely to initiate breastfeeding and commonly experience delayed lactogenesis.55 These physical and emotional stressors are frequently compounded by weight-related stigma in postpartum care settings, contributing to reduced follow-up and fewer opportunities for support.

Despite the substantial demands of postpartum recovery, care is often limited to a single 6-week visit, which inadequately addresses the complexities of healing, pain, mental health, and metabolic risk. This narrow window of care overlooks a critical opportunity to ensure continuity, screen for complications, and support individualized recovery plans. Integrative approaches that emphasize whole-person care, trauma-informed communication, and proactive support can help bridge the gaps and reframe postpartum recovery as an essential phase to affect long-term health outcomes.

Postpartum Weight Retention: What We Miss When We Focus on the Scale

Postpartum weight retention remains one of the most persistent challenges following pregnancy. Approximately 75% of individuals do not return to their pre-pregnancy weight within the first year, with an average retention of 4 to 5 kg.51 This risk is even greater among those with obesity, particularly when excessive gestational weight gain occurs, a pattern observed in 35% to 50% of pregnancies.21, 48 Individuals who gain ≥20 kg during pregnancy are significantly more likely to retain weight postpartum compared with those who remain within recommended guidelines.21 For individuals with elevated BMI or cardiometabolic risk, even modest postpartum weight reduction may contribute to the prevention of diabetes and cardiovascular disease.51

While the long-term risks of postpartum weight retention are well-documented, the way weight in clinical care settings is discussed can have equally lasting effects. Individuals with higher BMI report negative experiences with a provider, citing language that feels insensitive, or overly focused on risk without context.52 This approach can cause emotional distress and damage the therapeutic relationship. While sharing risk information is important, patients have expressed that it can feel overwhelming or stigmatizing when not paired with empathy, support, or actionable solutions.52 Patients emphasize the importance of having their diet and activity preferences considered and receiving not just warnings, but collaborative plans developed in partnership with their care team.52

Rather than centering care around weight loss alone, focus should be shifted to energy, function, metabolic health, and long-term disease prevention. Weight-inclusive frameworks, such as intuitive eating and mindful movement, offer more sustainable and compassionate alternatives.52 Naturopathic strategies such as blood sugar regulation, anti-inflammatory nutrition, stress reduction, and individualized care planning align well with this philosophy. Reframing postpartum recovery around whole-person wellness, rather than just a return to baseline weight, is an effective and empowering approach.

Metabolic and Cardiovascular Risk: A Critical Window

Between 50% and 60% of individuals with obesity gain more than the recommended gestational weight, increasing the likelihood of complications such as gestational hypertension, preeclampsia, and gestational diabetes.21 Many also enter pregnancy with pre-existing conditions such as chronic hypertension or diabetes, factors that significantly raise the risk of severe maternal morbidity and long-term cardiovascular disease.53

Nearly one in three women will experience a cardiovascular event within 20 years of delivery, with risks especially elevated among those with pre-existing heart disease or adverse pregnancy outcomes.54 Obesity further compounds these risks, particularly when postpartum weight retention is present.55 These cumulative effects reflect broader cardiometabolic shifts initiated during pregnancy. Inflammatory activity, insulin resistance, and lipid alterations can persist postpartum, impacting blood pressure regulation, vascular health, and endothelial function.56

The risk for venous thromboembolism also rises significantly in the postpartum period, with the highest incidence occurring in the first 6 weeks. Individuals with obesity who have undergone a recent Caesarean birth are at even greater risk. While routine prophylaxis may not be indicated for everyone, early mobilization, adequate hydration, and the use of compression devices should be considered for those at higher risk.21

Despite these risks, postpartum care rarely includes cardiometabolic follow-up. Many individuals are not screened until symptoms arise, often years or even decades later.57 One-third of those with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy develop chronic hypertension within 10 years.57 Earlier identification of risk and implementation of preventive care beginning in the postpartum period could significantly improve long-term maternal health outcomes.

Mental Health and the Mind-Body Disconnect

Mental and metabolic health are deeply interconnected, yet mental health is often overlooked in postpartum care and lifestyle interventions. Individuals with pre-pregnancy obesity, excessive gestational weight gain, or postpartum weight retention are at higher risk for depressive and anxiety symptoms during pregnancy and the postpartum period.21 This is a bi-directional relationship where depression and anxiety can hinder efforts to make lifestyle changes, and additional challenges such as stigma, sleep disturbances, emotional eating, and body image concerns can further compromise mental well-being.

Individuals with a pre-pregnancy BMI ≥30 kg/m2 or a history of anxiety or depression are more likely to experience depressive or anxiety symptoms in subsequent pregnancies, especially when compounded by poor sleep.58 Those sleeping less than 6 hours per night report lower resilience, higher stress, and increased anxiety.58 This highlights the need for routine screening, using a tool such as the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Score (EPDS), and early support.

Naturopathic and integrative strategies, including cognitive behavioural therapy, nutrition, exercise, and sleep hygiene, can play a vital role in reducing symptoms and supporting recovery. Supporting mental health is foundational, not optional, in comprehensive postpartum care.

What Works: Translating Evidence into Postpartum Care

Lifestyle changes can improve postpartum health outcomes, but real-life barriers, such as financial strain, lack of childcare, fatigue, and cultural expectations, often limit access to support. Traditional approaches fall short when they fail to consider these realities.

Emerging research highlights adaptable models that prioritize flexibility and community. Virtual interventions, such as Facebook-based or app-delivered group programs, have proven both feasible and acceptable for time-constrained parents.59 Community-based group programs have also shown benefits, improving weight outcomes, well-being, and participant satisfaction by aligning with individual needs and preferences.60

This is where integrative care excels, offering personalized, relationship-based support that goes beyond weight or calories. Through motivational interviewing, behavioural coaching, and holistic strategies, practitioners can help patients make sustainable changes aligned with their values. Effective postpartum care must be flexible, culturally sensitive, and grounded in trust.

Looking Ahead: Postpartum as the Start of Preconception Care

Postpartum care does not end at 6 weeks; it extends into the months and years that follow, especially for those planning future pregnancies. The interpregnancy interval is a key window to reduce modifiable risk factors, optimize metabolic health, and prevent complications in the next pregnancy. When weight, blood sugar, and lifestyle are addressed during this time, outcomes improve significantly for both parent and baby.

Both the SOGC and ACOG highlight that even modest weight loss between pregnancies can reduce maternal and fetal risks, including GDM, Caesarean birth, stillbirth, and LGA infants.9,21 A weight loss of over 2 BMI units is linked to a 40% lower risk of having a LGA infant, without increasing the risk of SGA, unless weight loss exceeds 8 BMI units.21 Clinicians are advised to offer behavioural counselling on diet and physical activity, as combined interventions are more effective than exercise alone.9

Improving postpartum outcomes requires reimagining care as a year-long, multidisciplinary effort. Obesity-related complications persist beyond 6 weeks and intersect with mental health, metabolic risk, and care gaps. A collaborative model including naturopathic doctors, dietitians, mental health professionals, midwives, and obstetricians can deliver proactive, whole-person care. Shifting from reactive to preventive care reduces cardiometabolic risk, builds emotional resilience, and addresses weight stigma through culturally responsive, relationship-based support.

CONCLUSION

Obesity during the perinatal period significantly influences the trajectory of maternal and child health, increasing the risk of metabolic, obstetric, and neonatal complications. While the evidence clearly supports early and sustained intervention, clinical strategies remain underutilized and often fragmented across disciplines. Addressing obesity in pregnancy requires more than weight-based metrics; it involves comprehensive assessment of metabolic status, dietary quality, nutrient adequacy, physical activity, and psychosocial support.

This review highlights key areas for intervention, including the role of targeted laboratory testing, evidence-informed dietary strategies, safe supplementation of key nutrients, and personalized physical activity programs adapted for the perinatal period. The postpartum period is a crucial, yet often neglected, opportunity to support weight management, prevent type 2 diabetes, and address cardiovascular risk, while also supporting lactation and maternal recovery.

Future directions should prioritize interdisciplinary collaboration, including obstetrics, primary care, nutrition, behavioural health, and community-based support systems. Research is also needed to refine diagnostic criteria, evaluate the long-term effects of prenatal interventions, and ensure equitable care for populations disproportionately affected by obesity and its sequelae.

Ultimately, shifting the narrative around perinatal obesity from one of risk to one of opportunity may help improve outcomes. By engaging individuals with obesity in informed, respectful, and integrated care before, during, and after pregnancy, clinicians can play a pivotal role in breaking intergenerational cycles of metabolic disease and promoting lasting health for families.

AUTHOR AFFILIATIONS

1Independent Researcher, Toronto, ON, Canada

2McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada

3Independent Researcher, St. Catharines, ON, Canada

4Independent Researcher, Sault Ste. Marie, ON, Canada

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

Not applicable

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST DISCLOSURE

We have read and understood the CAND Journal’s policy on conflicts of interest and declare that AP, MM, and KH have none. CK is employed by The Confident Clinician, but this work was conducted entirely independently of that employment. The company had no role in this manuscript.

FUNDING

This research did not receive any funding

REFERENCES

1. Langley-Evans SC, Pearce J, Ellis S. Overweight, obesity and excessive weight gain in pregnancy as risk factors for adverse pregnancy outcomes: a narrative review. J Hum Nutr Diet. 2022;35(2):250–264. https://doi.org/10.1111/jhn.12999
Crossref  PubMed  PMC

2. Almutairi FS, Alsaykhan AM, Almatrood AA. Obesity prevalence and its impact on maternal and neonatal outcomes in pregnant women: a systematic review. Cureus. 2024;16(12):e75262. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.75262

3. Lim S, Harrison C, Callander E, Walker R, Teede H, Moran L. Addressing obesity in preconception, pregnancy, and postpartum: a review of the literature. Curr Obes Rep. 2022;11:405–414.
Crossref  PubMed  PMC

4. Lindsay K, Brennan L, Rath A, Maguire OC, Smith T, McAuliffe FM. Gestational weight gain in obese pregnancy: impact on maternal and foetal metabolic parameters and birthweight. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2018;38(1):60–65.
Crossref

5. Berenson AB, Pohlmeier AM, Laz TH, Rahman M, Saade G. Obesity risk knowledge, weight misperception, and diet and health-related attitudes among women intending to become pregnant. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2016;116(1):69–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jand.2015.04.023
Crossref

6. Ross R, Neeland IJ, Yamashita S, et al. Waist circumference as a vital sign in clinical practice: a consensus statement from the IAS and ICCR Working Group on Visceral Obesity. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2020;16(3):177–189. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41574-019-0310-7
Crossref  PubMed  PMC

7. Maxwell C, Gaudet L, Cassir G, et al. Guideline no. 391—pregnancy and maternal obesity part 1: pre-conception and prenatal care. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2019;41(11):1623–1640. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jogc.2019.03.026
Crossref  PubMed

8. Jevitt CM, Ketchum K. Pairing evidence-based strategies with motivational interviewing to support optimal nutrition and weight gain in pregnancy. J Perinat Neonatal Nurs. 2024;38(1):25–36. https://doi.org/10.1097/jpn.0000000000000792
Crossref  PubMed

9. Obesity in pregnancy: ACOG practice bulletin, number 230. Obstet Gynecol. 2021;137(6):e128–e144. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000004395
Crossref  PubMed

10. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Optimum vitamin D dose during pregnancy for those medically classified as being in the overweight or obesity weight categories. 2023. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng247

11. Mashayekh-Amiri S, Mohammad-Alizadeh-Charandabi S, Abdolalipour S, Mirghafourvand M. Myo-inositol supplementation for prevention of gestational diabetes mellitus in overweight and obese pregnant women: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabetol Metabol Syndr. 2022;14(1):93.
Crossref

12. Louis JM, Mogos MF, Salemi JL, et al. Obstructive sleep apnea and severe maternal–infant morbidity/mortality in the United States, 1998–2009. Sleep 2014;37:843–849.
Crossref  PubMed  PMC

13. Mead L, Mitchell M, Deussen AR, Dodd JM. Motivational interviewing in the preconception period for women with overweight or obesity. Obes Res Clin Pract. 2024;18(5):S46.
Crossref

14. Karlsen K, Humaidan P, Sørensen LH, Alsbjerg B, Ravn P. Motivational interviewing: a part of the weight loss program for overweight and obese women prior to fertility treatment. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2013;29(9):839–842. https://doi.org/10.3109/09513590.2013.808326
Crossref  PubMed

15. Malhotra N, Jevitt CM, Stoll K, Phillips-Beck W, Vedam S, RESPCCT Study Team. Weight-based disparities in perinatal care: quantitative findings of respect, autonomy, mistreatment, and body mass index in a national Canadian survey. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2024;24(1):737. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-024-06928-8
Crossref  PubMed  PMC

16. Alberga AS, McLaren L, Russell-Mayhew S, von Ranson KM. Canadian senate report on obesity: focusing on individual behaviours versus social determinants of health may promote weight stigma. J Obes. 2018;2018(1):8645694. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/8645694
Crossref  PubMed  PMC

17. Poniedziałek-Czajkowska E, Mierzyński R, Leszczyńska-Gorzelak B. Preeclampsia and obesity—the preventive role of exercise. Int J Environ Res Public Heal. 2023;20(2):1267. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20021267
Crossref

18. Institute of Medicine. Weight gain during pregnancy: reexamining the guidelines. National Academies Press; 2009.

19. Dalfra’ MG, Burlina S, Lapolla A. Weight gain during pregnancy: a narrative review on the recent evidences. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2022;188:109913. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diabres.2022.109913
Crossref  PubMed

20. Martínez-Hortelano JA, Cavero-Redondo I, Álvarez-Bueno C, Sanabria-Martínez G, Poyatos-León R, Martínez-Vizcaíno V. Interpregnancy weight change and hypertension during pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 2020;135(1):68–79. https://doi.org/10.1097/aog.0000000000003573
Crossref

21. Maxwell C, Gaudet L, Cassir G, et al. Guideline no. 392—Pregnancy and maternal obesity part 2: team planning for delivery and postpartum care. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2019;41(11):1660–1675. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jogc.2019.03.027
Crossref  PubMed

22. Catalano PM, Shankar K. Obesity and pregnancy: mechanisms of short-term and long-term adverse consequences for mother and child. BMJ. 2017;356:j1. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.j1
Crossref

23. Fox R, Kitt J, Leeson P, Aye CYL, Lewandowski AJ. Preeclampsia: risk factors, diagnosis, management, and the cardiovascular impact on the offspring. J Clin Med. 2019;8(10):1625. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm8101625
Crossref  PubMed  PMC

24. Croke L. Gestational hypertension and preeclampsia: a practice bulletin from ACOG. Am Fam Physician. 2019;100(10):649–650.
PubMed

25. Bartsch E, Medcalf KE, Park AL, Ray JG, High Risk of Pre-eclampsia Identification Group. Clinical risk factors for pre-eclampsia determined in early pregnancy: systematic review and meta-analysis of large cohort studies. BMJ. 2016;353:i1753. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i1753
Crossref  PubMed  PMC

26. Magee LA, Smith GN, Bloch C, et al. Guideline no. 426: hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: diagnosis, prediction, prevention, and management. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2022;44(5):547–571.e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jogc.2022.03.002
Crossref  PubMed

27. Chen WY, Sun SF. Clinical efficacy of low-dose aspirin combined with calcium in preventing preeclampsia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine. 2023;102(34):e34620. https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000034620
Crossref  PubMed  PMC

28. AlSubai A, Baqai MH, Agha H, et al. Vitamin D and preeclampsia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. SAGE Open Med. 2023;11:20503121231212092. https://doi.org/10.1177/20503121231212093
Crossref

29. World Health Organization. Vitamin D supplementation in pregnant women: guidelines. 2012. http://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241500275

30. Government of Canada. Diabetes. Public Health Agency of Canada. 2025. https://www.canada.ca/en/public-health/services/chronic-diseases/diabetes.html

31. Sweeting A, Wong J, Murphy HR, Ross GP. A clinical update on gestational diabetes mellitus. Endocr Rev. 2022;43(5):763–793. https://doi.org/10.1210/endrev/bnac003
Crossref  PubMed  PMC

32. Berger H, Gagnon R, Sermer M. Guideline no. 393—diabetes in pregnancy. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2019;41(12):1814–1825.e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jogc.2019.03.008
Crossref  PubMed

33. Griffith RJ, Alsweiler J, Moore AE, et al. Interventions to prevent women from developing gestational diabetes mellitus: an overview of Cochrane Reviews. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020;6(6):CD012394. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD012394.pub3
PubMed  PMC

34. Factor PA, Corpuz H. The efficacy and safety of myo-inositol supplementation for the prevention of gestational diabetes mellitus in overweight and obese pregnant women: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J ASEAN Fed Endocr Soc. 2023;38(2):102–112. https://doi.org/10.15605/jafes.038.02.11
Crossref  PubMed  PMC

35. Pakmehr A, Ejtahed HS, Shirzad N, Hemmatabadi M, Farhat S, Larijani B. Preventive effect of probiotics supplementation on occurrence of gestational diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Front Med. 2022;9:1031915. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.1031915
Crossref

36. Kurnaz D, Karaçam Z. The effect of methods used in the management of maternal obesity on pregnancy and birth outcomes: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Int J Obes. 2025;49(6):1013–1023. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41366-025-01748-y
Crossref

37. Kapadia MZ, Park CK, Beyene J, Giglia L, Maxwell C, McDonald SD. Weight loss instead of weight gain within the guidelines in obese women during pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analyses of maternal and infant outcomes. PLoS ONE. 2015;10(7):e0132650. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0132650
Crossref  PubMed  PMC

38. Hart TL, Petersen KS, Kris-Etherton PM. Nutrition recommendations for a healthy pregnancy and lactation in women with overweight and obesity—strategies for weight loss before and after pregnancy. Fertil Steril. 2022;118(3):434–446. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2022.07.027
Crossref  PubMed

39. Minhas AS, Duvall C, Michos ED. Diet as a lifestyle intervention to lower preeclampsia risk. J Am Hear Assoc. 2024;13(5):e032551. https://doi.org/10.1161/jaha.123.032551
Crossref

40. Liu L, Zhou Y, He L. Mediterranean diet for the prevention of gestational diabetes: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Matern-Fetal Neonatal Med. 2022;35(26):10247–10252. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2021.1966764
Crossref  PubMed

41. Seneviratne SN, McCowan LME, Cutfield WS, Derraik JGB, Hofman PL. Exercise in pregnancies complicated by obesity: achieving benefits and overcoming barriers. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;212(4):442–449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2014.06.009
Crossref

42. Mottola MF, Davenport MH, Ruchat SM, et al. 2019 Canadian guideline for physical activity throughout pregnancy. Br J Sports Med. 2018;52(21):1339. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2018-100056
Crossref  PubMed

43. Martínez-Vizcaíno V, Sanabria-Martínez G, Fernández-Rodríguez R, et al. Exercise during pregnancy for preventing gestational diabetes mellitus and hypertensive disorders: an umbrella review of randomised controlled trials and an updated meta-analysis. BJOG. 2023;130(3):264–275. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.17304
Crossref

44. Xie W, Zhang L, Cheng J, Wang Y, Kang H, Gao Y. Physical activity during pregnancy and the risk of gestational diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and dose–response meta-analysis. BMC Public Health. 2024;24(1):594. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-024-18131-7
Crossref  PubMed  PMC

45. Endres LK, Straub H, McKinney C, et al. Postpartum weight retention risk factors and relationship to obesity at 1 year. Obstet Gynecol. 2015;125(1):144–152. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000000585
Crossref  PubMed  PMC

46. Blomberg M. Maternal and neonatal outcomes among obese women with weight gain below the new Institute of Medicine recommendations. Obstet Gynecol. 2011;117(5):1065–1070. https://doi.org/10.1097/aog.0b013e318214f1d1
Crossref  PubMed

47. Ruhstaller KE, Elovitz MA, Stringer M, Epperson CN, Durnwald CP. Obesity and the association with maternal mental health symptoms. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2017;30(16):1897–1901. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2016.1229766
Crossref

48. Bijlholt M, Ameye L, van Uytsel H, Devlieger R, Bogaerts A. Evolution of postpartum weight and body composition after excessive gestational weight gain: the role of lifestyle behaviours—data from the INTER-ACT control group. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(12):6344. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18126344
Crossref  PubMed  PMC

49. Moussa HN, Alrais MA, Leon MG, Abbas EL, Sibai BM. Obesity epidemic: impact from preconception to postpartum. Future Sci OA. 2016;2(3):FSO137. https://doi.org/10.4155/fsoa-2016-0035
Crossref  PubMed  PMC

50. Mogren IM. BMI, pain and hyper-mobility are determinants of long-term outcome for women with low back pain and pelvic pain during pregnancy. Eur Spine J. 2006;15(7):1093–1102. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-005-0004-9
Crossref  PubMed  PMC

51. Lubrano C, Locati F, Parisi F, et al. Gestational weight gain as a modifiable risk factor in women with extreme pregestational BMI. Nutrients. 2025;17(4):736. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu17040736
Crossref  PubMed  PMC

52. Dever M, Skouteris H, Rodriguez ACI, et al. Weight stigma in the preconception, pregnancy, and postpartum periods: a systematic review of women’s perspectives. Obes Rev. 2025;26(5):e13891. https://doi.org/10.1111/obr.13891
Crossref  PubMed  PMC

53. Gunderson EP, Greenberg M, Najem M, et al. Severe maternal morbidity associated with chronic hypertension, preeclampsia, and gestational hypertension. JAMA Netw Open. 2025;8(1):e2451406. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.51406
Crossref  PubMed  PMC

54. Siu SC, Lee DS, Rashid M, Fang J, Austin PC, Silversides CK. Long-term cardiovascular outcomes after pregnancy in women with heart disease. J Am Heart Assoc. 2021;10(11):e020584. https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.120.020584
Crossref  PubMed  PMC

55. Lewey J, Beckie TM, Brown HL, et al. Opportunities in the postpartum period to reduce cardiovascular disease risk after adverse pregnancy outcomes: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2024;149(7):e330–e346. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001212
Crossref  PubMed  PMC

56. Kosinski C, Rossel JB, Gross J, et al. Adverse metabolic outcomes in the early and late postpartum after gestational diabetes are broader than glucose control. BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2021;9(1):e002382. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjdrc-2021-002382
Crossref  PubMed  PMC

57. Staff AC, Costa ML, Dechend R, Jacobsen DP, Sugulle M. Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy and long-term maternal cardiovascular risk: bridging epidemiological knowledge into personalized postpartum care and follow-up. Pregnancy Hypertens. 2024;36:101127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.preghy.2024.101127
Crossref  PubMed

58. Van Uytsel H, Ameye L, Devlieger R, et al. Mental health during the interpregnancy period and the association with pre-pregnancy body mass index and body composition: data from the INTER-ACT randomized controlled trial. Nutrients. 2023;15(14):3152. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu15143152
Crossref  PubMed  PMC

59. Waring ME, Pagoto SL, Simas TAM, et al. Delivering a postpartum weight loss intervention via Facebook or in-person groups: results from a randomized pilot feasibility trial. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2023;11:e41545. https://doi.org/10.2196/41545
Crossref  PubMed  PMC

60. Makama M, Skouteris H, Moran LJ, et al. Co-designing a community lifestyle intervention program to reduce postpartum weight retention. Health Expect. 2024;27(1):e13905. https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.13905
Crossref


Correspondence to: Alexsia Priolo, 656 The Queensway, Etobicoke, ON M8Y 1K7, Canada. E-mail: alexsia@alexsiapriolo.com

To cite: Priolo A, King C, McNaughton M, Hroch K. Supporting perinatal health in individuals with obesity: integrative and naturopathic perspectives. CAND Journal. 2025;32(3):2-10. 10.54434/candj.214

Received: 31 May 2025; Accepted: 5 August 2025; Published: 18 September 2025

© Author(s) 2025. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license. See https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. For commercial re-use, please contact candj@cand.ca.


CAND Journal | Volume 32, No. 3, September 2025

(Return to Top)